Essa tal proclamação da república (Portuguese Edition)
Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device.
You can download and read online Essa tal proclamação da república (Portuguese Edition) file PDF Book only if you are registered here.
And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Essa tal proclamação da república (Portuguese Edition) book.
Happy reading Essa tal proclamação da república (Portuguese Edition) Bookeveryone.
Download file Free Book PDF Essa tal proclamação da república (Portuguese Edition) at Complete PDF Library.
This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats.
Here is The CompletePDF Book Library.
It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Essa tal proclamação da república (Portuguese Edition) Pocket Guide.
Body Lotions Face Creams. Tents Accessories Lights Camping Bed. Billiard Fishing Toss Games. Business Writing Skills. Graphic Novels Comic Strips. My Wishlist. Know about stores. Products of this store will be shipped directly from the US to your country. Products of this store will be shipped directly from the UK to your country. Products of this store will be shipped directly from China to your country. Products of this store will be shipped directly from Japan to your country.
The sketch did not look like Robert Murat. In some respects, the sketch resembled the earlier sketch drawn up by Jane Tanner.
The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews
This was despite the facts that a she frankly admitted that she had never seen the face of the man on 3 May and b the man with the straggly hair and the moustache looked nothing like Robert Murat. We believe it was yet another lie by the British police to continue the claim that Madeleine was abducted, when she was not. They said that this photograph was taken by her mother, Dr Kate McCann, on the last day of their holiday, Thursday 3rd May, at about 2. We will present a summary of evidence below which suggests that this was a deliberate lie by the McCanns and by those supporting them 4 32 33 We will show that this photograph was almost certainly taken on Sunday, 29th April at lunch-time.
Further, we will show that there is no credible, truly independent evidence that Madeleine was alive after the afternoon of Sunday 29th April The photograph is said to have been taken by Kate McCann. The experts also pointed out, however, that it was a relatively simple matter to change the date and time stamp, to try to prove that a photograph was taken on a different date from the actual date 33 3. These disks included three photographs of Madeleine happily playing in the Ocean Club playground on the first day of the holiday Saturday 28th April.
Furthermore, it is clear from the PJ files that the two computer disks of photos were compiled with the additional help of Alex Woolfall, the Head of Risk, employed by the huge PR firm, Bell Pottinger. He has admitted this. The firm, and those who run it, have been totally discredited.
Bell Pottinger also received huge payments from various corrupt regimes and individuals they worked for in different parts of the world] 5. The weather when the photo was taken This is a crucial evidential point that the PJ had no opportunity to consider. At lunch-time on Thursday 3 May, the weather was cloudy and cool 17 deg C. This can be demonstrated from assorted weather records and photographs.
By contrast, the weather on Sunday lunchtime 29th April was sunny and very warm 21 deg C. By Monday, a cold front had already brought cooler and cloudier weather with some rain. This lasted until Friday 4 Now we need to look at the evidence of the photo itself. None of these features match the claim that this photograph was taken on Thursday 3rd May. They all match, however, with the only sunny and warm day of the holiday: Sunday 29th April.
The photograph was not produced by the McCanns until Thursday 24 May.
Only five photographs of Madeleine on that holiday are claimed to exist. We have mentioned four of them: a There were three photographs of Madeleine taken on the Saturday. However, we have shown that it must have been taken on Sunday 29th April. There are numerous problems with this photo 35 36 There are no other children in shot. In addition, some observers have noted that whilst the head of the girl in the photograph is clearly that of Madeleine, the body of the girl looks different from Madeleine in a number of ways. That is wholly consistent with our case that Madeleine died on the Sunday.
We should add that a Mr Philip Edmonds, a Director of Stemcor, the international steel company, was on holiday that week with his three sons, and claimed to have taken a photograph of his three sons playing in the Ocean Club playground, on Thursday 3rd May, showing Madeleine McCann in the background. He further claimed publicly that he had sent this photograph to the PJ.
- Brasil Escola no Youtube;
- The Year of Zero (The Adventures of Audie Dale Smith).
- Quoi dire quand ? (Essais et documents) (French Edition)!
- Teatime Shapes (Suzy-Jane Tanners Childrens Books Book 4);
However, no such photograph appears in the PJ files, not has it been published elsewhere. There is every reason to doubt whether — even if he has supplied such a photograph — that it could prove that Madeleine was alive that day Nuno Lourenco claimed he was living in Germany but had been over to Sagres for a short holiday to see his mother, who still lives in the area. He also gave the police the last four digits of the car registration number of the vehicle.
A Republica Portuguese Edition Novel Pdf | Gk Trick Book Pdf Free Download
Krokowski and his wife had been holidaying at an apartment in the Sol e Mar building in Burgau. The account he gives of the attempted kidnap lacks credibility in several respects: a why would a holidaymaker, with his car apparently parked some way away outside the village, attempt in broad daylight to kidnap a child? This seems to us like more than a coincidence 9 Taking all these matters into account, and having regard also to the astonishing coincidences between the descriptions given by Jane Tanner of the man and Nuno Lourenco of Wojchiech Krokowski , we arrive at these very disturbing conclusions: 1 Jane Tanner and Nuno Lourenco were describing the same man — Wojchiech Krokowski 2 The description must therefore have been based on Wojchiech Krokowski and what he was wearing that week 3 Either Jane Tanner and Nuno Lourenco must have colluded in order to give police identical descriptions, OR at least one third party must have planned this collusion, and given them instructions on what to say to the police 3.
This means that Jane Tanner, Nuno Lourenco, and any or all people who colluded in deceiving the police in this way have committed the offence in English law of perverting the course of justice. In English law this offence attracts the maximum penalty of 14 years. What is astonishing is that when they travelled to Portugal to give their statements on 26 May, they also gave an almost identical description of the man they claimed they saw to those given by Jane Tanner and Nuno Lourenco.
If we are correct in asserting that Madeleine was probably dead on Sunday, then what possible explanation can there be for him reporting seeing someone, at about It raises a realistic possibility that this was also a fabrication, and that Martin Smith and his family were also using the same description of Wojchiech Krokowski. The crucial evidence that Madeleine was still alive at 5.
These contradictions have been analysed by many Madeleine researchers. It is simply not possible to accept Catriona Baker as a witness of truth. Furthermore, research has uncovered the fact that Catriona Baker probably knew the McCanns before this holiday 4. Records on the social media group Facebook show that Catriona Baker was, in and possible before then, a Facebook friend of Chloe Corner. Jon Corner was highly involved in events after Madeleine was reported missing.
Within hours, he was seemingly able to send unlimited photos of Madeleine to the media, from his home in Liverpool. In addition, Jon Corner said he had been to Praia da Luz several times previously, suggesting a connection with the village. Jon Corner also lived with the McCanns for around a week in August , during which time he took them to Huelva to distribute leaflets about Madeleine.
A Republica Portuguese Edition Novel Pdf
He made a film about Madeleine which was later used by Panorama for their programme about Madeleine shown on 19 November 4. In November , six months after Madeleine was reported missing, Catriona Baker visited the McCanns in Rothley, staying with them for a number of days. We have said that Madeleine was seen alive on Sunday 29th April at lunch-time. All other claims by witnesses who claim to have seen Madeleine after Sunday have been examined in detail by a British ex-pat now living in Canada, Lizzy Taylor She concluded that apart from the evidence given by the McCanns and their Tapas 7 friends - which of course is not independent — all other statements claiming to have seen her were open to serious doubt.
Many were extremely vague, with no checkable details given. Others were plainly wrong, for example, witnesses claiming to have seen Madeleine eating breakfast with the McCanns in the Millennium when the McCanns in their statements have consistently said they ate breakfast in their apartment every day from Monday onwards. The absence of any other reliable witness to seeing Madeleine from Monday onwards is disturbing, and strongly tends to confirm that Madeleine was not alive after Sunday. It shows Madeleine with a great deal of make-up, namely: - a necklace - a hair bead - lipstick - eye shadow, and - eye liner.
It must also be said that Madeleine has very dilated large pupils in the photo, and there is no sign whatsoever of any happiness or joy. Rather, she looks deeply sad. When this photo was published, it attracted much negative comment, including in one British broadsheet newspaper, the Independent. A prominent criminologist, Mark Williams-Thomas, also criticized the McCanns for releasing this photograph although it is by no means certain that the McCanns gave permission for this photograph to be published Many Madeleine researchers who have studied this photograph carefully have made these observations about it 14 15 : 1 Madeleine could not have applied the eyeliner herself.
She could not have applied either the lipstick or the blue eye-shadow neatly. She certainly could not have put on her necklace herself, nor her hair bead. An adult must have done all this, but we have not been told who did it.
Philip J Havik | Universidade Nova de Lisboa - pemilusydney.org.au
Therefore the McCanns have not been truthful about the circumstances in which this photograph was taken. That means we are entitled to ask serious questions about when, where and why it was taken. On the contrary, there seems to be a look of sadness, or even fear or dread in her eyes. This is most unlike houses built in England. However, it strongly resembles the outdoor cladding of many buildings along the Algarve coast in Portugal.
Very clear photographic evidence and other accompanying evidence proves that the identical pair of pyjamas were personally displayed by the McCanns at two press conferences, one in London on 5th June , the other in Amsterdam, Holland, on 7th June It follows from these two facts that the entire claim by the McCanns that Madeleine was abducted - in her pyjamas, between 9.
Madeleine must therefore have disappeared under entirely different circumstances. In reply, we make the following points.